|
Situation in the "single market" with regard to unsolicited commercial
electronic communications under the Cappato amendment to the draft
|
| COUNTRY | Data Protection Directive 1995 (95/46/EC) | E-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) | Distance Selling Directive (97/7/EC) |
| Austria | All data processing must be notified in advance to data protection authority | Superceded by implementation of 97/7/EC | Implements opt-in - provisions are more strict than the directive |
| Belgium | Late and very weak implementation | Planned opt-in | No effect (does not implement opt-out) |
| Denmark | Fails to distinguish between corporate and personal data | Superceded by implementation of 97/7/EC | Implements opt-in for e-mail only, not other forms of communication |
| France | Not yet clear - Data Protection Authority supports opt-in. | Plans opt-out, but no plans on how this is implemented | No effect (does not implement opt-out) |
| Finland | Implements opt-in but for the moment marketers are being allowed to send unsolicited messages to customers asking if they can send them unsolicited messages | Commercial e-mail needs to be clearly identifiable as such | Spam covered by telecoms data security act |
| Germany | Very strict - some organisations claim the directive is "gold plated" | Labelling provisions included under opt-in | Spam prohibited already by other means - opt-in provisions are more stringent than the directive |
| Greece | "Processing of personal data will be permitted only when the data subject has given his/her consent." Appears to prohibit processing of e-mail addresses by third parties without active consent | No text notified yet. | Implements opt-in - transposed provisions on e-mail are stricter than the directive |
| Ireland | Very late implementation | Probably opt-out but confusion regarding how to implement | No provisions on unsolicited e-mail transposed |
| Italy | Fails to distinguish between corporate
and personal data |
Superceded by implementation of 97/7/EC | Implemented opt-in |
| Luxembourg | Not yet in force | Supports opt-out but no specific plans on how to implement | No measures notified yet to the Commission |
| Netherlands | No specific restrictions, national telecoms regulator supports opt-in | Illegal to send e-mail to consumers sigened up to a register. | No measures notified yet to the Commission |
| Spain | Only general provisions - access to and the right to modify information and data must be used for the purpose for which it was gathered | Plans to implements opt-in | No measures notified yet to the Commission |
| Sweden | The supervisory authority is entitled
for its supervision to obtain on request a) access to the personal
data that is processed, b) information about and documentation of the processing of personal data and security of this processing |
Supports opt-out, but without any clear plans on
how this will be implemented. |
Supports company by company opt-out |
| Portugal | Data subject must be informed of third party obtaining personal data and purposes for which it will be used - restricted opt-out regime | No effect | No effect (opt-out registers already foreseen) |
| United Kingdom | DP Authority will only act if a message contains evidence of being the result of illegal data collection | Undecided | Ignores relevant provision - consultation underway on this issue in relation to Directive 95/46/EC |
| Top |